Skip to main content
Home
plus.maths.org

Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Main navigation

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • For

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

    Popular topics and tags

    Shapes

    • Geometry
    • Vectors and matrices
    • Topology
    • Networks and graph theory
    • Fractals

    Numbers

    • Number theory
    • Arithmetic
    • Prime numbers
    • Fermat's last theorem
    • Cryptography

    Computing and information

    • Quantum computing
    • Complexity
    • Information theory
    • Artificial intelligence and machine learning
    • Algorithm

    Data and probability

    • Statistics
    • Probability and uncertainty
    • Randomness

    Abstract structures

    • Symmetry
    • Algebra and group theory
    • Vectors and matrices

    Physics

    • Fluid dynamics
    • Quantum physics
    • General relativity, gravity and black holes
    • Entropy and thermodynamics
    • String theory and quantum gravity

    Arts, humanities and sport

    • History and philosophy of mathematics
    • Art and Music
    • Language
    • Sport

    Logic, proof and strategy

    • Logic
    • Proof
    • Game theory

    Calculus and analysis

    • Differential equations
    • Calculus

    Towards applications

    • Mathematical modelling
    • Dynamical systems and Chaos

    Applications

    • Medicine and health
    • Epidemiology
    • Biology
    • Economics and finance
    • Engineering and architecture
    • Weather forecasting
    • Climate change

    Understanding of mathematics

    • Public understanding of mathematics
    • Education

    Get your maths quickly

    • Maths in a minute

    Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Maths in a minute
  • Puzzles
  • Videos
  • Topics and tags
  • Audiences

    • cat icon
      Curiosity
    • newspaper icon
      Media
    • graduation icon
      Education
    • briefcase icon
      Policy

    Secondary menu

  • My list
  • About Plus
  • Sponsors
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • Log in
  • Football

    A fairer football sweepstake

    Keeping the playing field level
    Salim Neil Khan
    9 June, 2026

    With the FIFA World Cup about to begin, many people will be planning on participating in a sweepstake. Everyone pays a nominal entry fee, is then randomly allocated one of the competing teams, and at the end of the competition the participant with the winning team wins all the money.

    But you know what it's like. If you draw a team that's an outsider, you rapidly lose interest as the team heads for early elimination.

    Here we look at an alternative sweepstake version which could be claimed to be fairer and more engaging than the traditional format. This idea was first described in an earlier article in 2020, and has been updated for this article by including data from the 2022 World Cup.

    Shirt number sweepstakes

    In this fairer version, there are up to ten participants and each is randomly assigned a unique integer between 0 and 9 for the whole tournament. They then receive a set number of points whenever the last digit of a goalscorer's shirt number matches their assigned number. For example, if a participant is assigned the number 3, then they receive a fixed number of points whenever a player wearing shirt number 3, 13 or 23 scores.

    This keeps participants engaged throughout the tournament, as they can score points in every game. They will almost certainly be invested in several players in each game, and will be cheering for both teams! Also, the sweepstake can even be started after the tournament has begun, with scoring counted only from then onwards.

    Another big appeal is that it is fairer than the traditional sweepstake as it is designed so that each participant has a similar chance of winning. This is achieved by weighting the points awarded for each goal according to how often that shirt number usually scores, as we will describe now.

    The table below shows goal-scoring frequencies (including own goals) in the World Cup from 2002-2022 for each number forming the last digit of a shirt number. As number 9 has scored 2.5333 times as many goals as number 8, then to make it fair, number 8  should receive 2.5333 times as many points as number 9 when they score a goal. Similar calculations were carried out by dividing the highest total (190 for shirt 9) by each of the totals for the other shirt numbers. This gave the weightings, or points allocations, for goals scored by each shirt number. 

    For example, Shirt 0 Weighting = 190 / 160 = 1.1875

    Last digit of
    shirt number
    Total goals in World Cup
    from 2002-2022
    Weighting
    01601.1875
    11371.3869
    2493.8776
    3722.6389
    4702.7143
    5523.6538
    6503.8000
    71081.7593
    8752.5333
    91901

    To keep the calculations user-friendly, let’s round the weightings to the nearest 0.5 and double them to make them all integers. This gives the proposed points system as follows.

    Last digit of
    shirt number
    0123456789
    Points per
    goal
    2385578452

    Illustrating this using the 2022 World Cup game between England and Iran; player numbers 7, 10, 11, and 22 each scored once, and player numbers 9 and 17 each scored twice. This would translate to number 0 receiving 2 points, number 1 receiving 3 points, number 2 receiving 8 points, number 7 receiving (3x4 =) 12 points, and number 9 receiving (2x2 =) 4 points.

    So how fair does this points system turn out in practice? Applying it to the last six World Cup tournaments gives the following:

    YearWinning
    sweepstake
    number
    Winning
    points
    Runner-up
    sweepstake
    number
    Runner-up
    points
    20022 & 6 joint first104--
    2006181465
    2010475169
    20143115895
    20182104796
    2022080776

    We can see that there are six different winners (numbers 2, 6, 1, 4, 3, and 0), and if we included a runner up prize this brings a further two sweepstake numbers into the picture (7 and 8). This implies that the sweepstake system proposed is relatively fair in that many of the participants can expect a reasonable chance of obtaining a prize. Furthermore when comparing the points scores between the winner and runner up, it can be seen that they are generally very close, suggesting an exciting sweepstake.


    About the author

    Slom Khan

    Slim Khan is an Analytics Consultant at Minitab and is particularly interested in mathematics and statistics related to games and sports.

    • Log in or register to post comments

    You might also like

    package
    Football in net

    The maths of the World Cup

    It's the FIFA World Cup! In case the 104 matches aren't enough football for you, we have created a collection of resources all about the maths underpinning the game.

    news

    Hitting the spot

    What's the best spot to aim a penalty at?
    article

    Blink and you'll miss it: The free kick in football (part I)

    Free kicks deliver much drama. But how should strikers approach them and how does the design on the ball matter?

    Read more about...

    mathematics in sport
    football

    Our Podcast: Maths on the Move

    Our Maths on the Move podcast brings you the latest news from the world of maths, plus interviews and discussions with leading mathematicians and scientists about the maths that is changing our lives.

    Apple Podcasts
    Spotify
    Podbean

    Plus delivered to you

    Keep up to date with Plus by subscribing to our newsletter or following Plus on X or Bluesky.

    University of Cambridge logo

    Plus is part of the family of activities in the Millennium Mathematics Project.
    Copyright © 1997 - 2026. University of Cambridge. All rights reserved.

    Terms